Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
TrackAIPAC career-total report shows $693,198 from AIPAC and pro-Israel-lobby PACs.
AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures targeting U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel. RESOLUTE Citizen treats documented AIPAC contributions as a failure on foreign_policy_restraint/q4 (the foreign-lobby question) AND applies a dollar-bracket adjustment to the total score.
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Next Election
November 3, 2026
Primary · Seat up at next election
—until
Official Profile
Religion: Presbyterian
Education: Georgetown University (BS Biology), Georgetown University School of Medicine (MD), Yale Medical School (residency)
Birthplace: Reading, Pennsylvania
Background: Board-certified orthopedic surgeon who practiced in Casper, Wyoming for 24 years. Former Wyoming State Senator. Senate Majority Whip since 2025. Appointed to Senate in 2007.
Candidate affirms life begins at conception and personhood from conception
TRUE (+2)
i 1 claim
Listed on the SBA Pro-Life America National Scorecard with a consistent pro-life voting record; has voted to stop all taxpayer funding of abortion domestically and internationally and to protect conscience rights for pro-life healthcare providers. Stated at his 2007 Senate appointment that he had 'sponsored legislation to protect the sanctity of life' — affirming protection of unborn life from conception.
Candidate supports completed physical border barrier and active military border presence
TRUE (+2)
i 1 claim
A leading Senate border-security hawk who introduced the Build The Wall Act and a 2024 bill funding southern-border wall construction with unused COVID-19 appropriations; praised the 2025 'Big Beautiful Bill' for its $75 billion border enforcement appropriation and completion of the physical wall — describing Biden-era border policy as 'the deadliest, most destructive, and most disastrous in American history.'
A steadfast Second Amendment defender who voted against a 2013 background-check expansion bill and cosponsored a suite of Second Amendment protection bills with Sen. Lummis in 2023, opposing all legislation restricting law-abiding citizens' firearm access — calling the Second Amendment 'freedom's safeguard.'
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
References & footnotes
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.
You are disputing claim . Please describe the issue and link to the primary source that contradicts it.
Thank you! We'll review your submission and update the profile if verified.