Who Actually Grades Well?
Every elected official in our database scored against the v4.0 RESOLUTE Citizen rubric — 10 categories, 50 questions, 100 points. 60 points come from God First (✝ life, marriage, family sovereignty, Christian liberty, economic stewardship, election integrity); 40 from America First (🇺🇸 border, self-defense, foreign-policy restraint, industry capture). Scores include foreign-influence adjustments (AIPAC, Soros, China-linked PACs).
Coverage as of : ~190 federal officials carry individually-curated v4.0 scores (top of Senate, House leadership, Squad, Freedom Caucus, SCOTUS, cabinet, top governors); ~400 House members carry party-default archetype scores; the remaining ~7,890 are flagged as partial pending evidence review. Read the full methodology →
How to read the score — dynamic max explainer
A candidate's letter grade reflects the percentage of their personal max, not the global 100-point scale. The personal max is 2 points × the number of questions where we found public-record evidence. A candidate scored on 45 of 50 questions caps at 90 points; if they got 45 True, that's 90 of 90 = 100% = A.
This stops penalizing officials for our inability to find their position. The 5 unanswered questions just shrink their possible-max instead of dragging their score down. If you have evidence on a specific candidate's position, the dispute form on every profile page goes straight into our review queue.
For absolute-comparison purposes, the "Total score (absolute)" sort option preserves the legacy /100 scale.
Top 50
Highest scorers| # | Name | State | Party | Office | GF | AF | Score | % | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||||||||
Bottom 50
Lowest scorers (excluding all-zero / unanswered)| # | Name | State | Party | Office | GF | AF | Score | % | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||||||||
Data source: data/search-index.json (regenerated nightly via build-search-index.py).
Have a correction? File a dispute on any candidate's profile page.