Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Listed on the SBA Pro-Life America National Scorecard; has voted to stop taxpayer funding of abortion and protect conscience rights for pro-life providers. After previously identifying as 'pro-choice,' reversed position in 2022 to support states' rights to restrict abortion post-Dobbs, and issued a formal statement affirming her pro-life votes.
Expressed support for the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which requires proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections — backing the rubric's voter-verification standard.
In June 2022, was one of only 15 Republican senators to vote for the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which expanded background checks for firearm buyers under age 21 and closed the 'boyfriend loophole' — a gun-control departure from the rubric's opposition to new firearm restrictions. Her NRA rating is 92%, reflecting a generally pro-Second Amendment record with this notable exception.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.