💡 U.S. Capitol switchboard — ask for Representative Patrick Mosolf.
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Official Profile
Religion: Not publicly stated (no evidence found)
Education: Northwestern University (BA); Master's in Human Rights, Development & Social Justice, The Hague (Netherlands); National Merit Finalist
Birthplace: Point Pleasant, Ohio
Background: 20+ years overseas governance/aid work: UN election monitor (Cambodia), UN Mission Liberia (2005), USAID Democracy & Governance Advisor (Cambodia), International Court of Justice (Myanmar 2018), USAID Bangladesh (Rohingya, 2021); most recently director of the USAID Local Development Office in Lebanon. Earlier ran a homeless shelter in Cincinnati. 2026 Democratic primary candidate for U.S. House VA-02 (Hampton Roads/Virginia Beach); certified onto the Aug 4 2026 DPVA primary ballot. Long-shot in a field led by Elaine Luria (polling ~1%).
Long-shot D primary challenger for U.S. House VA-02 (Hampton Roads/Virginia Beach); career USAID/foreign-aid technocrat; certified onto the Aug 4 2026 ballot. [2026-06 RESOLUTE refinement, federal tier — national autopilot] Issues page is conspicuously silent on every culture-war cell (abortion, marriage, religious liberty, 2A, parental rights, election integrity in the voter-ID sense) — scored null on those (no inference from party). One earned TRUE on foreign_policy_restraint q0: explicitly criticized Trump's Venezuela military actions as 'lacking proper congressional authorization' — supports the Article I war-powers requirement. His framing of accepting Trump's 2020 loss and opposing 'federal election procedures on the states' is anti-Trump-fraud-narrative posture but does not map cleanly to voter-ID / paper-ballot / mail-in cells (left null). Career USAID + criticism of USAID closures = pro-foreign-aid → does not give an aligned TRUE on foreign-aid restraint cells; conversely no documented vote/quote opposing aid → null on q2. No AIPAC money documented (long-shot challenger, FEC active but no AIPAC tracker hit) — null on q3 rather than inferred TRUE. Pro-Obamacare-extension + minimum-wage increase + corporate-tax review are pro-spending policy stances but do not directly map onto CBDC/sound-money/balanced-budget-amendment cells. NO EVIDENCE FOUND on religion or denomination. No conservative cross-party deviation.
Ballot currency 2026-10-03 (MBP-1003-NIGHT r2), official VA Dept of Elections ENR feed for the 2026-11-03 general (asOf 2026-10-02T19:17Z): NOT on the certified November ballot for U.S. Representative VA-02 (2026 D Candidate · challenger · Kiggans challenger); the ballot lists every qualified candidate and a write-in line only. Candidacy set to not_running and the election date cleared. Why they left the race (withdrew, did not qualify) is not stated by the source and is not asserted here.
Candidate affirms life begins at conception and personhood from conception
FALSE (0)
i 1 claim
Running as a Democrat for Virginia's 2nd Congressional District in the 2026 cycle, Mosolf is campaigning in a state where the Virginia General Assembly placed the Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment on the November 2026 ballot — a measure supported by every Democrat in the legislature and opposed by every Republican. Mosolf's platform of 'restoring America's democracy' and protecting healthcare access — consistent with the Virginia Democratic Party's unified support for constitutional abortion rights — places him on record against a life-at-conception or personhood standard. His former USAID career overseeing local development programs in Lebanon, Gaza-adjacent, and other fragile states is also consistent with support for reproductive-health services internationally.
Candidate opposes a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) and supports cash and decentralized crypto as legal tender
Not yet verified
Candidate supports sound-money policies including gold/silver as constitutional money and audit/abolition of the Federal Reserve
Not yet verified
Candidate opposes deficit spending and supports a balanced-budget constitutional amendment
FALSE (0)
i 1 claim
Opposes 'irrational tariffs' as harmful to Americans and campaigns for expanding Affordable Care Act subsidies, opening new public-option healthcare pathways, and more aggressively regulating the insurance and pharmaceutical industry — a government-expansion posture that conflicts with the rubric's balanced-budget and anti-deficit standard.
Candidate supports completed physical border barrier and active military border presence
Not yet verified
Candidate supports mandatory deportation of all illegal aliens, including those who entered as minors
FALSE (0)
i 1 claim
A former senior USAID official married to a naturalized immigrant, Mosolf has not called for mandatory deportation or mass removal of those in the country unlawfully; his platform centers on restoring democratic governance and legal immigration pathways rather than the deportation-first enforcement the rubric favors.
Candidate supports immediate withdrawal from forever wars and repeal of standing AUMFs
Not yet verified
Candidate opposes foreign aid to nations hostile to U.S. interests or actively persecuting Christians
FALSE (0)
i 1 claim
Spent his career as a USAID senior official directing U.S. foreign development assistance; his final posting led the Local Development Office in Lebanon, arriving days after the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza War. He explicitly frames continuation of USAID's mission as sound U.S. foreign policy.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
References & footnotes
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Campaign issues page criticizes Trump's Venezuela military actions as 'lacking proper congressional authorization' — affirms the Article I requirement that Congress authorize military action.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.
You are disputing claim . Please describe the issue and link to the primary source that contradicts it.
Thank you! We'll review your submission and update the profile if verified.