Share
Guy Reschenthaler
Score adjustments
Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
- AIPAC / pro-Israel-lobby contributions-20TrackAIPAC career-total report shows $482,879 from AIPAC and pro-Israel-lobby PACs.AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures targeting U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel. RESOLUTE Citizen treats documented AIPAC contributions as a failure on foreign_policy_restraint/q4 (the foreign-lobby question) AND applies a dollar-bracket adjustment to the total score.
Contact This Official
📍 Local district offices (2)
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Official Profile
Category Breakdown
1 claim
Praised the Dobbs decision as 'historic' and a 'tremendous victory for life,' and voted against H.R. 8296 (Women's Health Protection Act of 2022), which would have created a federal right to abortion and overridden state pro-life laws — consistent with the rubric's protection of unborn life from conception.
- U.S. HouseOfficial
- WikipediaEncyclopedia
1 claim
Reschenthaler voted for the Protect Children's Innocence Act (H.R. 3492, December 17, 2025), which criminalizes physicians who perform gender-transition procedures on minors at the federal level — affirming that biological sex is immutable and protecting children from gender-ideology-based medical interventions.
- Congress.govOfficial
- GovTrack.usReference
1 claim
Voted NO on President Biden and Democrats' $3.5 trillion reconciliation package (2021), warning the bill would add hundreds of billions to the national debt; has maintained consistent opposition to large unpaid spending increases throughout his tenure, opposing what he termed the 'Socialist Spending Scam.'
- U.S. HouseOfficial
- GovTrack.usReference
1 claim
Voted NO on H.R.1, House Democrats' 'For the People Act' (2021), which would have undermined voter ID laws, mandated expansion of mail-in balloting, and legalized ballot harvesting; Reschenthaler called it 'Democrats' Electoral Power Grab' and has consistently opposed legislation that weakens election-integrity safeguards.
- U.S. HouseOfficial
- GovTrack.usReference
1 claim
Voted for H.R. 2, the Secure the Border Act of 2023, which funds border-wall construction, ends catch-and-release, and tightens asylum rules. Has publicly stated he will 'fight to secure our border,' end sanctuary cities, and 'crack down on child sex trafficking' at the border.
- Congress.govOfficial
- U.S. HouseOfficial
1 claim
Voted against H.R. 8 (universal background checks) and H.R. 1446 (extended background check delays) in the 117th Congress, calling them 'draconian' bills that 'criminalize common practices among gun owners' and 'deprive law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment rights.'
- U.S. HouseOfficial
- BallotpediaCenter
1 claim
During House floor debate on Ukraine aid legislation, Reschenthaler publicly called for speeding up weapon deliveries to Ukraine and condemned critics of open-ended funding as promoting 'defeatism, pessimism, and surrender' — aligning with the interventionist, indefinite-commitment camp rather than the rubric's call to wind down foreign military entanglements and restore congressional war-powers oversight.
- WikipediaEncyclopedia
- Congress.govOfficial
Sources & Evidence
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
References & footnotes
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
- [1]Ballotpedia Center
- [2]U.S. House Official
- [3]Congress.gov Official
Have Information About This Official?
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.