
Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Identifies as pro-choice and calls abortion access 'a basic human right,' opposing any government restriction on reproductive decisions after Dobbs — rejecting personhood from conception.
Voted NAY on the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act (H.R.28, 119th Congress, House Roll Call #12, January 14, 2025, passed 218-206), which amends Title IX to restrict athletic competition categories to biological sex and bars biologically male athletes from competing in women's sports at federally funded institutions. He voted NAY alongside virtually all House Democrats — rejecting the biological-sex definition and opposing the exclusion of transgender athletes from women's sports.
Voted NAY on the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act (H.R.5403, 118th Congress, House Roll Call #230, May 23, 2024, passed 216-192), which would have barred the Federal Reserve from launching a retail central bank digital currency. All 213 Republicans present voted YES; only three Democrats crossed over. Deluzio voted NAY, indicating no opposition to federal CBDC development — contrary to the rubric's anti-surveillance monetary standard.
Voted NAY on the SAVE Act (H.R.22, 119th Congress, House Roll Call #102, April 10, 2025, passed 220-208), which requires documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration in federal elections and mandates removal of non-citizens from voter rolls. Deluzio issued a statement labeling the bill 'a voter suppression tactic' and voted with virtually all House Democrats against it — opposing the rubric's documentary voter-ID and anti-mass-mail-in standard.
Voted NO on H.R. 5525, the Continuing Appropriations and Border Security Enhancement Act of 2024, opposing the border-security-enforcement provisions; consistently supports 'humane' immigration pathways over the mandatory-deportation and wall-construction policies the rubric calls for.
A vocal gun-control advocate: co-introduced legislation to ban firearms at polling places ahead of the 2024 election and celebrated $8.5 million in federal funding for extreme-risk protection order (red-flag) programs under the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act — directly opposing constitutional-carry and anti-red-flag positions.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.