Share
Score adjustments
Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
- AIPAC / pro-Israel-lobby contributions-10TrackAIPAC career-total report shows $211,632 from AIPAC and pro-Israel-lobby PACs.AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures targeting U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel. RESOLUTE Citizen treats documented AIPAC contributions as a failure on foreign_policy_restraint/q4 (the foreign-lobby question) AND applies a dollar-bracket adjustment to the total score.
Contact This Official
📍 Local district office (1)
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Official Profile
Category Breakdown
1 claim
A consistent pro-choice vote throughout his Senate tenure; supports unrestricted federal abortion access and has opposed every legislative effort to limit abortion at any stage — rejecting any protection of unborn life from conception.
- WikipediaEncyclopedia
- BallotpediaCenter
1 claim
Supports same-sex marriage and voted for the Respect for Marriage Act (2022), which codified federal recognition of same-sex unions into law; has publicly criticized officials who refused to protect LGBTQ rights — rejecting the one-man-one-woman definition of marriage.
- WikipediaEncyclopedia
- BallotpediaCenter
1 claim
Voted for the 2013 Dianne Feinstein amendment banning magazines over 10 rounds and co-sponsored the 2019 Background Check Expansion Act requiring universal background checks on all firearm transfers — directly opposing the rubric's defense of Second Amendment rights against new restrictions.
- WikipediaEncyclopedia
- GovTrack.usReference
Sources & Evidence
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
References & footnotes
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
- [1]Ballotpedia Center
- [2]Congress.gov Official
Have Information About This Official?
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.