Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
After Dobbs, Hickenlooper condemned the ruling as threatening women's 'control over her own future' and called on Republicans to 'keep politics out of reproductive health care decisions.' His consistent pro-abortion stance rejects any recognition of human personhood beginning at conception.
Cosponsors the Equality Act, which extends federal civil-rights protections to sexual orientation and gender identity in workplaces, schools, and public accommodations — mandating legal recognition of LGBTQ identity categories that conflicts with the biblical definition of marriage as between one man and one woman.
As Colorado governor signed bills in 2013 mandating universal background checks on all gun transfers and banning magazines holding more than 15 rounds; as U.S. Senator cosponsors the Background Check Expansion Act and advocates banning assault weapons — a consistent record opposing Second Amendment rights without restriction.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.