Share
Score adjustments
Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
- AIPAC / pro-Israel-lobby contributions-20TrackAIPAC career-total report shows $335,142 from AIPAC and pro-Israel-lobby PACs.AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures targeting U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel. RESOLUTE Citizen treats documented AIPAC contributions as a failure on foreign_policy_restraint/q4 (the foreign-lobby question) AND applies a dollar-bracket adjustment to the total score.
Contact This Official
📍 Local district offices (3)
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Official Profile
Category Breakdown
1 claim
A longtime fiscal hawk who has stalled or voted against large unoffset spending bills from both parties and seeks a balanced budget, objecting to multi-trillion-dollar packages 'no one has had time to read.'
- WikipediaEncyclopedia
1 claim
Voted against the February 2024 $95B Ukraine/Israel foreign-aid package and has repeatedly opposed open-ended Ukraine funding, arguing the war is not winnable and U.S. money should not flow indefinitely — aligning with the rubric's call to wind down foreign military entanglements.
- thebadgerproject.orgUnclassified
- WikipediaEncyclopedia
1 claim
A persistent critic of COVID-era pharmaceutical and public-health mandates: convened Senate roundtables on vaccine injuries and demanded a vote to end the military's COVID-19 vaccine mandate, challenging the pharma-government consensus the rubric warns against.
- U.S. SenateOfficial
- WikipediaEncyclopedia
Sources & Evidence
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
References & footnotes
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
- [1]Ballotpedia Center
- [2]Congress.gov Official
Have Information About This Official?
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.