
Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Holds a 100% pro-life record from SBA Pro-Life America; spoke on the House floor in favor of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act and voted consistently to protect the lives of the unborn and to defund Planned Parenthood — including through the 2025 reconciliation bill H.R.1 that stripped Planned Parenthood of Medicaid dollars for one year.
In December 2024 opposed raising the U.S. debt ceiling, drawing criticism from President-elect Trump — Roy held firm, consistent with his Freedom Caucus record of resisting uncapped deficit spending and calling for balanced-budget discipline.
In January 2025 reintroduced the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act to require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections; the bill passed the House in 2024 but died in the Senate, and Roy continued to champion it in the 119th Congress as a core election-integrity measure.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.