Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
TrackAIPAC career-total report shows $274,371 from AIPAC and pro-Israel-lobby PACs.
AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures targeting U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel. RESOLUTE Citizen treats documented AIPAC contributions as a failure on foreign_policy_restraint/q4 (the foreign-lobby question) AND applies a dollar-bracket adjustment to the total score.
Candidate affirms life begins at conception and personhood from conception
TRUE (+2)
i 1 claim
As Governor of South Dakota, signed the Women's Health and Human Life Protection Act (2006) — a near-total abortion ban aimed at challenging Roe v. Wade — and as U.S. Senator has maintained a 100% pro-life voting record, receiving Family Research Council Action's 'True Blue' award for voting to protect babies born alive after failed abortions and to end taxpayer-funded abortion.
Candidate supports completed physical border barrier and active military border presence
TRUE (+2)
i 1 claim
Supports physical barrier construction and military-level resources at the southern border; has consistently backed border-wall funding and increased personnel for border enforcement, framing border security as inseparable from national security.
A consistent Second Amendment advocate who opposes new federal gun restrictions; his Senate issues page highlights his work to protect law-abiding gun owners from regulatory overreach and he supported constitutional-carry-aligned legislation in the Senate.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
References & footnotes
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.
You are disputing claim . Please describe the issue and link to the primary source that contradicts it.
Thank you! We'll review your submission and update the profile if verified.
