Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
TrackAIPAC career-total report shows $357,118 from AIPAC and pro-Israel-lobby PACs.
AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures targeting U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel. RESOLUTE Citizen treats documented AIPAC contributions as a failure on foreign_policy_restraint/q4 (the foreign-lobby question) AND applies a dollar-bracket adjustment to the total score.
Religion: Christian (raised Catholic; attended Episcopal and United Church of Christ services; does not foreground faith publicly)
Education: B.S. Finance, Albright College (1991); M.B.A., University of Connecticut (1993); M.P.P., Harvard Kennedy School (1999)
Birthplace: West Reading, Pennsylvania
Background: Former Mayor of Braddock, Pennsylvania for 13 years and Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania. AmeriCorps volunteer. Known for unconventional style and work on revitalizing Braddock.
Fetterman is the most politically interesting figure in this set. Heritage Action 0% means his voting record is solidly Democratic despite media narrative of 'moving right.' His rightward moves are on ISRAEL (bombing Iran, unconditional support) and TONE (voting for Trump nominees, attacking progressive purity). Still scores 0% Heritage Action and F NRA. Progressive base has turned on him — 33% approval among PA Dem primary voters. Called NRA members 'lunatic fringe.' His stroke and depression hospitalization remain factors. Wife Gisele is Brazilian immigrant activist.
Candidate affirms life begins at conception and personhood from conception
FALSE (0)
i 1 claim
Position stated in his 2022 Senate campaign: 'That is between a woman and her physician.' Opposes any legal restrictions on abortion at any gestational age including the third trimester. Continues to advocate for abortion access without restriction.
Candidate supports completed physical border barrier and active military border presence
TRUE (+2)
i 1 claim
Told Politico December 2023: 'I hope Democrats can understand that it isn't xenophobic to be concerned about the border,' calling monthly southern-border encounter numbers 'astonishing.' One of the few Democratic Senators to publicly break with progressives on border-security enforcement.
Candidate supports Article I congressional war-powers requirement before any U.S. military action
FALSE (0)
Candidate supports immediate withdrawal from forever wars and repeal of standing AUMFs
FALSE (0)
Candidate opposes foreign aid to nations hostile to U.S. interests or actively persecuting Christians
FALSE (0)
i 1 claim
Since the Oct. 7 2023 Hamas attack has become one of Israel's most outspoken defenders in the Senate. In January 2025 was the only Democratic senator to vote with all Republicans for cloture on the bill to sanction the International Criminal Court for issuing warrants against Netanyahu and Defense Minister Gallant. Denounced Biden March 2024 for not voting against the UN Security Council ceasefire resolution.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
References & footnotes
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.
You are disputing claim . Please describe the issue and link to the primary source that contradicts it.
Thank you! We'll review your submission and update the profile if verified.