Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Received a perfect 2024 legislative score from Reproductive Freedom for All (the successor organization to NARAL Pro-Choice America), confirming she consistently votes with the abortion-industry endorsement-and-funding network the rubric flags at question 4.
A consistent gun-control advocate who voted for the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (2022) expanding background checks and funding red-flag laws, and has backed universal background check legislation across multiple Congresses — opposing the rubric's defense of unrestricted Second Amendment rights.
As the senior Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Shaheen was a lead advocate for the $95B Ukraine/Israel/Taiwan aid package passed in February 2024 and has consistently pushed for open-ended U.S. military commitments abroad — opposing the rubric's call to end forever wars and restore Article I war powers.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.