Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Co-sponsored the STOP CSAM Act (unanimously advanced from committee in 2025) cracking down on online child sexual-abuse material by allowing victims to sue platforms that host it. Vocal critic of Big Tech platform liability shields that protect distribution of child-harming content.
NRA 93% (2018), 86% (2016).
Introduced bipartisan 2024 legislation to prevent Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) from owning pharmacies, directly addressing the pharma-distribution capture that drives up prescription drug costs. Heritage Action 117th-Congress score: 94%.
Lead sponsor of the PELOSI Act (advanced from committee in 2025) banning Members of Congress from trading or holding individual stocks. Only Republican to vote in favor of the July 2025 insider-trading bill. Direct accountability against the defense-contractor revolving-door pattern that question 5 addresses.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.