Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Served as a Planned Parenthood Vice President from 2003 to 2006 — a direct organizational and financial tie to the nation's largest abortion provider — placing her squarely inside the abortion-industry network the rubric flags at question 4.
Voted for the Respect for Marriage Act (2022) codifying same-sex marriage in federal law, championed LGBTQ diplomatic protections, and co-authored a New York Times op-ed expanding abortion access after Dobbs — consistently rejecting the one-man-one-woman marriage definition and the sanctity-of-life framework.
Voted for the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (2022), which expanded background-check requirements for buyers under 21 and funded state red-flag law implementation, and as a new senator signed a letter calling for federal gun-violence hearings after the 2018 Stoneman Douglas shooting — opposing the rubric's defense of unrestricted Second Amendment rights.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.