Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Campaign vision: committed to 'uphold the principles Roe stood for,' protect abortion access, and join pledges declining prosecution of abortion-related offenses.
Openly queer; accepted endorsements from Stonewall DFL, OutFront Minnesota, and the LGBTQ Victory Fund — single-issue endorsements that are hard evidence against the man-woman marriage position.
Openly queer; accepted endorsements from Stonewall DFL, OutFront Minnesota, and the LGBTQ Victory Fund — single-issue endorsements that are hard evidence against the man-woman marriage position.
Issued an official office statement for Trans Day of Visibility (2024).
Office promotion of LGBTQ+ identity in public policy: official TDOV statement; office marched at Pride (her own post).
Office policy requires prosecutors to 'meaningfully consider all collateral consequences at every stage of every case,' explicitly including 'immigration impacts' — charging calibrated to avoid deportation consequences, the opposite of mandatory-deportation support.
Sanctuary-aligned posture: charged two on-duty ICE officers with assault during the 2026 MN immigration crackdown (first known such charges; DOJ asserted Supremacy Clause immunity); office eased U/T-visa certification for non-citizen crime victims.
Sanctuary-aligned posture: charged two on-duty ICE officers with assault during the 2026 MN immigration crackdown (first known such charges; DOJ asserted Supremacy Clause immunity); office eased U/T-visa certification for non-citizen crime victims.
No explicit gun-control advocacy found; her traffic-stop policy reduces gun-possession prosecutions (she countered guns appear in <0.5% of such stops) — scored under public_justice, null here.
Documented adversarial relationship with law enforcement: police/trooper unions said her policies put law enforcement in a 'state of crisis' and sought her removal from the Londregan murder prosecution of a state trooper; LE leaders said her traffic-stop non-prosecution policy would 'embolden criminals.'
Ended bail requests for several low-level offenses ('it's wealth-based'); stopped prosecuting most felonies from low-level traffic stops; no-prison juvenile pleas in a murder case triggered a state takeover.
Ended bail requests for several low-level offenses ('it's wealth-based'); stopped prosecuting most felonies from low-level traffic stops; no-prison juvenile pleas in a murder case triggered a state takeover.
A judge took the rare step of rejecting her no-prison plea offer in the Braveheart murder case over the victim family's objection; victim families protested her juvenile plea deals; her Apr 2025 policy directed prosecutors to weigh defendants' 'racial identity' in plea negotiations — contrary to proportional, equal punishment.
A judge took the rare step of rejecting her no-prison plea offer in the Braveheart murder case over the victim family's objection; victim families protested her juvenile plea deals; her Apr 2025 policy directed prosecutors to weigh defendants' 'racial identity' in plea negotiations — contrary to proportional, equal punishment.
Her own framing: 'I believe in addressing the entire criminal legal system from a public health perspective.'
Asserted prosecutorial independence against the Walz/Ellison case takeovers ('undemocratic... dangerous precedent') — but a lawful gubernatorial reassignment power is not an unconstitutional state mandate; null.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.