Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
A decades-long opponent of any restrictions on abortion who joined the entire Senate Democratic caucus in cosponsoring the Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 to restore nationwide abortion access, and has consistently opposed Congressional bills that would defund Planned Parenthood — placing him squarely inside the abortion-industry funding network the rubric prohibits.
Voted for the Respect for Marriage Act (December 2022), federally codifying same-sex marriage by requiring all states to recognize it, and has publicly pushed to keep anti-LGBTQ provisions out of federal funding bills — rejecting the one-man-one-woman definition the rubric upholds.
Lead Senate sponsor of the Green New Deal resolution (S.Res.59) — a proposal to mandate net-zero emissions within ten years through trillions in new federal spending with no credible offset mechanism — the antithesis of the balanced-budget / anti-deficit posture the rubric requires.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.