Share
Score adjustments
Foreign-lobby money compromises America First. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel; AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures against U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. A candidate who has accepted that money has, in their own revealed preference, accepted a foreign-policy filter on their congressional vote. The same logic covers China-linked donations, where federal law also prohibits CCP members from contributing.
For every candidate with a documented donor record, two things happen: (1) the specific category question is marked False (foreign_policy_restraint[q4] for AIPAC + China; economic_stewardship[q5] — the WEF/ESG/Davos capture question — for Soros-network donors), so the per-category subscore drops by 2 points; (2) an additional dollar-bracket adjustment is applied to the total, making the penalty proportional to the magnitude of the funding. Both impacts are visible on this page.
- AIPAC / pro-Israel-lobby contributions-10TrackAIPAC career-total report shows $163,949 from AIPAC and pro-Israel-lobby PACs.AIPAC operates a super-PAC (United Democracy Project) that spent over $100M during the 2024 cycle on independent expenditures targeting U.S. candidates who criticize Israeli government policy. The U.S. has no formal mutual-defense treaty with Israel. RESOLUTE Citizen treats documented AIPAC contributions as a failure on foreign_policy_restraint/q4 (the foreign-lobby question) AND applies a dollar-bracket adjustment to the total score.
Contact This Official
📍 Local district offices (6)
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Official Profile
Category Breakdown
1 claim
States on his Senate website that 'science demonstrates that each human life begins at conception' and that 'the right to life guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution is vested in each human being'; supports legislation protecting life at its earliest stages.
- U.S. SenateOfficial
- BallotpediaCenter
1 claim
Traveled to El Paso to witness the southern border crisis and stated 'securing our borders is the first step'; supported the Secure the Border Act as 'a first step in addressing the humanitarian and national security crisis at our southern border.'
- U.S. SenateOfficial
- U.S. SenateOfficial
1 claim
Voted against the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (2022), stating 'I am a strong defender of the Constitution and the Second Amendment'; opposed background-check expansions and red-flag-law funding that the bill contained.
- U.S. SenateOfficial
- BallotpediaCenter
Sources & Evidence
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
References & footnotes
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
- [1]Ballotpedia Center
- [2]Congress.gov Official
Have Information About This Official?
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.