
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
Explicit pro-choice on record: 'I believe in a woman's right to choose' and 'that is a choice between my wife and me'; the 2021 NO vote on the city's pro-choice resolution was procedural ('the Legislature won't listen'), not a pro-life vote
Explicit pro-choice on record: 'I believe in a woman's right to choose' and 'that is a choice between my wife and me'; the 2021 NO vote on the city's pro-choice resolution was procedural ('the Legislature won't listen'), not a pro-life vote
Explicit public Christian profession: usher AND trustee at Bethel AME Church Tallahassee, listed on the church's official Board of Trustees roster and on his city-bio public profile
Explicit public Christian profession: usher AND trustee at Bethel AME Church Tallahassee, listed on the church's official Board of Trustees roster and on his city-bio public profile
Voted YES on FY2025 budget (3-2) at 4.42 millage AND on FY2026 budget at 4.4072 millage, both above rollback; explicitly rejected the rollback proposal that would have required ~$3.9M cuts. Honest framing: 'We raised the millage rate in order to pay for police services' — clears public_justice.0 but scores FALSE on the fiscal-restraint cell
Voted YES on FY2025 budget (3-2) at 4.42 millage AND on FY2026 budget at 4.4072 millage, both above rollback; explicitly rejected the rollback proposal that would have required ~$3.9M cuts. Honest framing: 'We raised the millage rate in order to pay for police services' — clears public_justice.0 but scores FALSE on the fiscal-restraint cell
Voted YES on FY2025 budget (3-2) at 4.42 millage AND on FY2026 budget at 4.4072 millage, both above rollback; explicitly rejected the rollback proposal that would have required ~$3.9M cuts. Honest framing: 'We raised the millage rate in order to pay for police services' — clears public_justice.0 but scores FALSE on the fiscal-restraint cell
Oct 22, 2025 voted AGAINST motion to rescind Tallahassee's 287(g) agreement with ICE — agreement REMAINS in force, TPD cooperates with ICE. Counts even where rhetoric framed it as reluctant compliance with state-removal threats
Oct 22, 2025 voted AGAINST motion to rescind Tallahassee's 287(g) agreement with ICE — agreement REMAINS in force, TPD cooperates with ICE. Counts even where rhetoric framed it as reluctant compliance with state-removal threats
Sustained affirmative pro-LE advocacy clears the high-bar: led FY2024 millage hike specifically to fund 20 ADDITIONAL TPD officers and TPD technology; voted YES on the $625K federal grant to hire officers (Nov 2025); publicly defended pro-police budget at conservative candidate forum — explicit pro-LE program, not just a budget vote
Sustained affirmative pro-LE advocacy clears the high-bar: led FY2024 millage hike specifically to fund 20 ADDITIONAL TPD officers and TPD technology; voted YES on the $625K federal grant to hire officers (Nov 2025); publicly defended pro-police budget at conservative candidate forum — explicit pro-LE program, not just a budget vote
Explicit compliance posture on a conservative-rubric state mandate: stated 'It would not be in my best interest to put myself in a position to potentially be removed from office' re: 287(g) — prioritizes state-law compliance over local resistance; the leftward DEI / Pride preemption frustrations are not rubric-coded
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.