
Reach out directly. Your voice matters. Proverbs 29:2 — When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice.
Joined the 6-1 majority in Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida v. State of Florida (April 2024), ruling that Florida's Privacy Clause does not protect abortion access and allowing the state's 6-week heartbeat ban to take effect — reversing the court's own 1989 activist precedent. During oral arguments, Chief Justice Muñiz questioned whether 'natural person' in the Florida Constitution could include the unborn.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Ad Fontes Media. Classifications for government, reference, and advocacy domains are maintained by U.S.M.C. Ministries; see source_bias.json.
Every answer above with a [n] marker corresponds to one of the footnotes below. Wayback-archive links preserve the page as it read at our access date so a reader can verify the citation even if the original URL changes or disappears.
His Amendment 4 concurrence describes the unborn as 'an entire class of human beings' deserving legal protection; pressed at oral argument whether constitutional 'natural person' includes the unborn -- an affirmative personhood-leaning judicial statement.
His Amendment 4 concurrence describes the unborn as 'an entire class of human beings' deserving legal protection; pressed at oral argument whether constitutional 'natural person' includes the unborn -- an affirmative personhood-leaning judicial statement.
Joined the 6-1 majority (Planned Parenthood v. State, 2024) holding the FL Constitution does not protect abortion and receding from prior precedent -- a judicial act removing the constitutional shield on abortion, beyond mere restriction.
Help us improve this scorecard. If you have evidence of this official's positions — voting records, social media posts, public statements, or corrections — submit it below and we'll review and update the profile.