This is inside-baseball governance — who screens the people who run state universities. The case for it is that bipartisan vetting makes regent seats less of a pure political reward and more of a competence question; the case against is that it adds a committee between voters' elected governor and the appointment, diffusing accountability. Neither cuts deeply on the issues this scorecard tracks. For most citizens this is a low-stakes structural tweak; weigh it on whether you trust nominating committees more or less than a single elected governor.
"Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them."
— Exodus 18:21 (KJV)