This is the quiet companion to the property-tax cut on the same ballot: a larger rainy-day fund. A bigger reserve is plain prudence — it lets the state weather a downturn or a hurricane season without scrambling, and it is the public-finance version of a household keeping savings on hand. The fair counter-question is whether parking up to a quarter of general revenue in reserve ties money up that could go to taxpayers or current needs, and the escape hatch — letting the Legislature suspend transfers — means the discipline is real only as long as lawmakers honor it. For a RESOLUTE voter, this leans stewardship-positive and low-drama; the case for 'yes' is simply that a government, like a family, should not spend to the edge of its income.
"There is treasure to be desired and oil in the dwelling of the wise; but a foolish man spendeth it up."
— Proverbs 21:20 (KJV)